Understanding Current Methods and Pain Points
In order to design an improved scheduling system, I needed a deeper understanding of our user base, the current methods by which they're organize gatherings, and how these methods may or may not be meeting their needs.
To accomplish this, I conducted interviews with 4 people at varying stages of their adulthood and ended up with a heap of information in the form of lengthy Google Documents and scattered notes. For the sake of clarity, I synthesized my findings in an affinity map using Miro. Presenting data in such a way helped me identify patterns and pain points that would later come in handy when brainstorming for solutions.
Some key insights:
- • A common scheduling method is manually texting back-and-forth in a group chat, which can get repetitive and prone to redundancies.
- • Most people have some level of experience with a dedicated scheduling tool, but have not carried that habit into their personal lives. This is for a variety of reasons, including work-life separation, technophobia, and/or inertia.
- • Most people feel that scheduling is easier with some form of visual aid, especially among larger groups.
Because of these difficulties, some people are deterred from proposing alternative options when they cannot make the initially suggested times. Instead, they choose to save their friends the hassle and simply not attend the event. Others are deterred from initiating the planning process altogether. 🙁
Fostering Empathy: Personas and User Journey Mapping
After the interviews, I developed two personas that encapsulated the characteristics, thoughts, and behaviors of different user groups. This helps me foster empathy for users and ensure I’m keeping their needs in mind as I create my design.
What Can We Learn From the Current Market?
Lastly, as the proverbial cherry-on-top of our user research process, I conducted a competitive audit to examine how existing scheduling tools in the market excel at helping people get together, as well as how they might fall short of that goal.
I found that:
- • Scheduling tools are positioned as a productivity/workspace aid. Now, this is not surprising as they are quite business-y by nature, but the lack of explicit branding or orientation toward personal may explain my previous finding that many people don't take these tools into their personal lives.
- • Most tools do not support multi-calendar integration. This is a missed opportunity to simplify scheduling by showing everybody’s availabilities upfront.
- • Tools that do support multi-calendar integration don't support polling. There’s a gap in the market for a tool that combines scheduling pooling with the capability to vote on timeslots.
After conducting this analysis, I felt better equipped to create something comprehensive: an app that supports polling, provides a collective visualization of a group’s availability via calendar integration, and diverges from the typical productivity focus by catering to everyday individuals seeking to enjoy time with friends and family.